Returns vs Bubble and Spreads

Continuing my research program, I regress S&P returns (nominal/real, price/total) upon the new valuation measure, nicknamed the bubble, and upon the three bond spreads: BAA-AAA, AAA-Long, Long-Short. We normalize this regression by volatility in the usual way. We consider averaging windows of 5 and 10 years.

Results: Each time, innovations are IID Gaussian. The ACF plots exhibit the same strange autocorrelation at lag 4. But overall, they are consistent with white noise. Each of three spreads is insignificant, judging by the Student test. But the bubble is significant for nominal (but not real!) returns, both price and total.

See the GitHub repository spreads-bubble-returns.

Published by


Response

  1. To Do List – My Finance

    […] large stock returns (measured by S&P) using annual volatility and the new valuation measure. We also used bond spreads but not rates, including them in our model. Our next actions […]

    Like

Leave a reply to To Do List – My Finance Cancel reply